|
ATCC
c2c12 myoblasts C2c12 Myoblasts, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/c2c12+myoblasts/C2C12/pm42319790-25-14-19 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c2c12 myoblasts - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
c2c12 murine myoblasts C2c12 Murine Myoblasts, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/c2c12+myoblasts/C2C12/10__1113_slash_jp291418-102-0-3 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c2c12 murine myoblasts - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
murine c2c12 myoblasts ![]() Murine C2c12 Myoblasts, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/c2c12+myoblasts/C2C12/pmc13276142-239-0-3 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
murine c2c12 myoblasts - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
mouse myoblastic c2c12 cells ![]() Mouse Myoblastic C2c12 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/c2c12+myoblasts/C2C12/pm42276402-78-0-4 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse myoblastic c2c12 cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ATCC
c2c12 myoblast cells ![]() C2c12 Myoblast Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/c2c12+myoblasts/C2C12/pm42230146-211-0-6 Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c2c12 myoblast cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
Article Title: Single-base 2′OMe-modified LNA and MOE gapmers selectively silence ACVR1 R206H in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102937
Figure Lengend Snippet: Preferential silencing of ACVR1 R206H in FOP patient-derived fibroblasts using LNA and MOE gapmers (A) Sequence alignment showing LNA and MOE gapmer binding sites spanning the ACVR1 c.617G>A mutation (R206H). Mismatches are shown in lowercase; green: ACVR1 WT variant; red: ACVR1 R206H variant. (B) Schematic overview of the experimental timeline: day 2, cell revival; day 0, seeding; day 1, transfection; day 3, RNA/protein harvest. Toxicity assessments were performed at 4, 12, 24, and 48 h post-transfection. (C and D) RT-qPCR analysis of total ACVR1 mRNA levels following treatment with 100 nM (C) or 10 nM (D) gapmers. (E) Representative immunoblots showing total ACVR1 protein levels post-treatment with 100 and 10 nM gapmers. GAPDH served as a loading control. (F and G) Quantification of total ACVR1 protein abundance relative to healthy control cells at 100 nM (F) and 10 nM (G) using densitometric analysis of the immunoblot images (E). (H–K) Allele-specific RT-qPCR quantification of ACVR1 WT (H, J) and ACVR1 R206H (I, K) transcript levels following treatment with 100 nM (H, I) or 10 nM (J, K) gapmers. (L) Representative immunoblots of V5-tagged ACVR1 WT and ACVR1 R206H proteins expressed in C2C12 cells 48 h post-treatment with 10 nM gapmers, with GAPDH as a loading control. (M and N) Densitometric quantification of immunoblot images (L) showing V5-tagged ACVR1 WT (M) and ACVR1 R206H (N) protein levels in C2C12 cells relative to untreated controls. Statistics, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. Data are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean ( n = 5–7). NT, non-treated; Lipo, lipofectamine 3000 (a commercially available transfection reagent).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Derivative Assay, Sequencing, Binding Assay, Mutagenesis, Variant Assay, Transfection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Control, Quantitative Proteomics
Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
Article Title: Single-base 2′OMe-modified LNA and MOE gapmers selectively silence ACVR1 R206H in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102937
Figure Lengend Snippet: Single-base 2′OMe modification enhances allele selectivity and suppresses ACVR1 R206H -induced osteogenic differentiation in vitro (A and B) RT-qPCR quantification of ACVR1 WT (A) and ACVR1 R206H (B) transcripts in FOP patient-derived fibroblasts treated with 10 nM LNA16 or MOE3 gapmers, with or without a single 2′OMe modification at the second position of the gap region. (C) Allelic fractions of ACVR1 WT and ACVR1 R206H transcripts post-treatment as calculated from total ACVR1 expression. Green and red bars represent ACVR1 WT and ACVR1 R206H transcript fractions, respectively. (D and E) RT-qPCR quantification of ACVR1 WT (D) and ACVR1 R206H (E) transcripts in C2C12 myoblasts transfected with V5-tagged ACVR1 WT or ACVR1 R206H constructs and treated with 10 nM gapmers for 48 h. (F) Allelic fraction analysis of ACVR1 WT and ACVR1 R206H transcripts in cells from (D and E), similarly as (C). (G) Representative immunoblot showing V5-tagged ACVR1 WT and ACVR1 R206H protein levels in transfected C2C12 cells after 10 nM gapmer treatment. GAPDH served as a loading control. (H and I) Densitometric quantification of ACVR1 WT (H) and ACVR1 R206H (I) protein expression from (G), normalized to GAPDH and expressed relative to the non-treated control. (J) Representative images of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining in C2C12 cells expressing V5- ACVR1 R206H or ACVR1 WT , treated with 10 nM gapmers and stimulated with recombinant human activin A (100 ng/mL) for 48 h. (K) Quantification of secreted ALP enzymatic activity in conditioned media collected from cells in (J), normalized to the ACVR1 WT media. (L) Representative images of ARS staining performed 21 days after osteogenic differentiation induction in C2C12 cells transfected with V5- ACVR1 R206H or ACVR1 WT and treated with gapmers. (M) Quantification of ARS staining from (L), normalized to the ACVR1 WT control. Statistics, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. Scale bars, 250 μm. Data are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean ( n = 6–7). NT, non-treated; Lipo, lipofectamine 3000 (a commercially available transfection reagent).
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Modification, In Vitro, Quantitative RT-PCR, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Transfection, Construct, Western Blot, Control, Staining, Recombinant, Activity Assay